In the face of such global environmental stresses as climate change and a burgeoning worldwide population, effective communication of successful wildlife conservation across international boundaries is imperative. In the future, the Refuge System will be used increasingly as an example for international conservation initiatives. The Refuge System should strengthen the focus and understanding of conservation efforts beyond national borders, especially regarding internationally shared species.
Over the last 20 years, the Service has moved to a broader and more collaborative vision of wildlife conservation, understanding that the United States is part of an interconnected, global web of conservation partners and ecological landscapes. Ultimately, no single group, agency or country can achieve wildlife conservation in isolation.
Service employees working on national wildlife refuges have been frequent hosts of international wildlife managers and have participated with the International Conservation staff on trips to foreign countries to advise them and help them develop capacity. The Service’s International Conservation staff also have access to a considerable network of on-the-ground conservationists around the globe. The Refuge System should work with the International Conservation staff to engage the network of conservation specialists around the globe to strengthen collaboration and integrate approaches to wildlife and habitat management.
Recommendation: Lend expertise and assistance to the Service’s International Conservation efforts to increase collaborative work on global issues and wildlife conservation projects.
Comment below and/or move on to next sub-section of Chapter 2 - Comprehensive Conservation Planning 2.0
2 Comments in this post »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
This section is very important and the recommendation is right on target. More is needed, however. Many of the rare and declining species we expend considerable resources to protect depend on habitats outside U.S. political borders. Conservation actions throughout entire Flyways are vital for species that rely upon the availability of suitable habitat at strategic locations along their migration routes. If they can fly, swim, or walk across U.S. borders into the control and management of neighboring countries, we should be investing in conservation activities, capacity building, outreach, and education in Canada, Latin America, and other international destinations to help secure our significant investments at home. The internet has opened new channels to global collaboration. For species that are shared by other countries the NWRS should develop an internet framework that supports the sharing of conservation strategies among refuge managers and protected areas in other countries; training programs, research and data, and the sharing of personnel with land management expertise.
I’m enthusiastic that the NWRS has an interest in international conservation and I agree with Raye that we should be investing in international regions to help secure our significant investments at home. The NWRS might also look to focus on what particular expertise and assistance is the best fit for international collaboration. What works in Kenai is very likely going to work in Kenya!